After Tariff Decision, What Happens to Trump’s Deals With China, Canada and Europe?

NYT Homepage

by Keith Bradsher, Meaghan Tobin, Eshe Nelson, Alexandra Stevenson, River Akira Davis, Alex Travelli, Choe Sang-Hun, Matina Stevis-Gridneff and Emiliano Rodríguez Mega

February 20, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling to invalidate many of President Trump’s tariffs has thrown uncertainty into the future of several key trade agreements. These deals, which were struck with major U.S. trading partners like China, Canada, and Europe, had set tariffs at 15% or 20%, reducing what would have been higher duties in exchange for favorable trade concessions and investments in the United States. While Trump stated that some agreements would still stand, he also announced a new 10% global tariff under a different legal authority, signaling a potential shift in strategy despite the court’s decision. The focus on China stands out as a central aspect of Trump’s trade policy. The country has been a primary target of his trade war, with its exports to the U.S. subject to multiple layers of tariffs imposed under various legal frameworks. These tariffs were often stacked, leading to significantly higher duties for certain products. The Supreme Court’s ruling removed some of these layers, including a 10% general tariff and another 10% levy针对中国未能阻止芬太尼流入美国的情况。This decision could potentially alter the balance of trade between the two countries, affecting industries and markets on both sides. In addition to China, Trump’s administration negotiated deals with Canada and Europe. These agreements aimed to reduce tariffs in exchange for concessions that were intended to benefit U.S. industries. However, the court’s ruling has created ambiguity about whether these deals will remain intact or face modifications. The announcement of a new 10% global tariff adds another layer of complexity, as it represents a departure from previous strategies and could disrupt international trade relations. The implications of this decision extend beyond individual countries to broader questions about U.S. trade policy and its impact on global markets. For businesses and industries reliant on stable trade agreements, the uncertainty created by the court’s ruling and Trump’s new tariff strategy poses challenges. This situation highlights the delicate balance between protecting domestic interests and maintaining positive international trade

Verticals

newsgeneral

Originally published on NYT Homepage on 2/20/2026