As Trump Considers Second Iran Attack, It Could Be Deadlier Than the First
NYT Homepage
by Mark Mazzetti and Helene CooperFebruary 20, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
President Trump is contemplating a new military campaign against Iran, which could be more extensive and dangerous than last year’s 12-day conflict. Following the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2026, all parties agreed to a ceasefire with no American casualties. However, this time, the Pentagon is engaged in its largest Middle East military buildup in two decades, signaling a potential shift toward a more ambitious operation led by U.S. forces.
The current strategy’s objectives remain unclear, but possibilities include targeting Iran’s nuclear sites, destroying its ballistic missile arsenal, or even attempting regime change—a move that could lead to devastating civilian casualties and regional instability. Trump has hinted at considering limited military strikes to pressure Iran into negotiations, but his broader goals are ambiguous.
This potential escalation matters because it could ignite a prolonged conflict with severe consequences for global security, particularly in the Middle East. The decision carries significant risks, including heightened tensions with Iran, ally relationships, and broader geopolitical stability. Readers interested in news will find this critical as it underscores the delicate balance of power and the potential for widespread violence in an already volatile region.
Verticals
newsgeneral
Originally published on NYT Homepage on 2/20/2026