Class action looms over allegations against endometriosis doctor
Sydney Morning Herald
by Liam Mannix, Henrietta CookFebruary 23, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
A Melbourne gynaecologist, Dr Simon Gordon, is facing a potential class action after allegations that he performed unnecessary surgeries on over 120 women, including procedures like ovary and uterus removals without sufficient clinical justification. The medical regulator is investigating these claims, which have left many women infertile and devastated physically, emotionally, and psychologically. Law firm Arnold Thomas & Becker is considering both individual and class action lawsuits against Gordon, with numerous women reporting that they were led to believe such surgeries were the only option for relief from endometriosis symptoms.
The case has raised significant concerns about the treatment of endometriosis, a condition characterised by pelvic pain and often misunderstood or neglected in the past. Leading gynaecologists have questioned the necessity of the procedures performed by Gordon, with one expert calling the removal of a normal ovary and fallopian tube "shocking." Gordon has defended his actions, stating that his goal was to alleviate pain and improve quality of life for patients historically overlooked by the medical system. However, critics argue that the surgeries in question were invasive and potentially avoidable.
The inquiry into Gordon's practices has broader implications for the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA), which is reviewing its approach to similar cases. Epworth Hospital, where Gordon worked, has commissioned an independent review, while the Victorian government faces pressure to expand the investigation. This case highlights systemic issues in medical regulation and patient care, particularly regarding endometriosis treatment.
The situation underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in healthcare. Women who feel wronged by unnecessary procedures have a voice, and legal action could set a precedent for better oversight of medical practices. For readers interested in women's health rights and medical accountability, this case serves as a critical reminder of the need for rigorous scrutiny of treatment decisions and patient outcomes.
Verticals
worldaustralia
Originally published on Sydney Morning Herald on 2/23/2026