Co-founder of Palestine Action: government’s ban on group ‘backfired’

Al Jazeera
February 13, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The UK government’s ban on Palestine Action, a pro-Palestinian group, has backfired after the High Court ruled that labeling it as a “terror” organization was unlawful. Huda Ammori, co-founder of the group, expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision, which she believes has brought justice to their cause and highlighted the government’s overreach. The ruling not only overturns the ban but also underscores the importance of protecting free speech and political advocacy, even when challenging state policies. The case gained attention after the UK Home Office designated Palestine Action as a proscribed organization in 2019, claiming it supported Hamas, which is classified as a terrorist group by the UK. However, the High Court found insufficient evidence to justify the ban, emphasizing that the group’s activities did not directly or indirectly support terrorism. This decision has sparked debates about the balance between national security and civil liberties, particularly in cases involving politically sensitive organizations. Ammori highlighted how the ban alienated moderate voices within the Palestinian community and weakened efforts for peace. She argued that Palestine Action’s work focused on promoting dialogue and non-violent resistance, aligning with international law. The ruling is seen as a significant victory for advocates of free expression and those challenging restrictive government policies. It also raises questions about how similar cases are handled in other countries, particularly when organizations advocating for Palestinian rights face scrutiny. The case has broader implications for UK-Palestinian relations and the treatment of pro-Palestinian groups globally. Critics argue that such bans often target lawful activities rather than actual terrorist plots, potentially stifling peaceful advocacy. As the legal battle continues to unfold, it remains a critical issue for those interested in international law, human rights, and the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine. In summary, the High Court’s ruling not only vindicates Palestine Action but also challenges the UK government’s approach to counter-terrorism policies. The decision has sparked important conversations about the limits of state authority versus individual freedoms, making it a key issue for anyone following global politics or human rights developments.
Verticals
worldpolitics
Originally published on Al Jazeera on 2/13/2026