Column: There should be no partisan divide about naming Epstein's fellow abusers - Los Angeles Times
Los Angeles Times
by LZ GrandersonFebruary 14, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The recent House Judiciary hearing brought attention to Attorney General Pam Bondi’s actions in addressing Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. While Bondi has focused on interviewing Ghislaine Maxwell and monitoring Rep. Pramila Jayapal, victims of Epstein’s abuse have been overlooked. This partisan divide over accountability highlights a deeper moral crisis in the country.
Bondi’s decision to prioritize political figures over survivors raises questions about transparency and justice. The redaction of names tied to Epstein’s operation further fuels concerns that powerful interests are avoiding scrutiny. This lack of action not only disservices victims but also perpetuates a culture of unaccountability, where politics outweighs morality.
The issue extends beyond the Justice Department, with Congress avoiding votes on the Epstein files and debates over Epstein’s nature as a pedophile. This reflects a broader societal failure to address child trafficking through a non-partisan lens, echoing warnings from historical figures like Micah about unchecked power and corruption.
Ultimately, this situation underscores the need for a collective shift in prioritizing justice over political gain. The moral implications of allowing abusers to evade accountability reveal a troubling flaw in our societal values. Addressing this crisis requires transcending partisan divides and focusing on ethical responsibility, ensuring that no one—regardless of power or influence—is above the law.
Verticals
newscalifornia
Originally published on Los Angeles Times on 2/14/2026