Contributor: Mexico's elections are a role model for the U.S. - Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times

by Paul Gillingham

February 11, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

Mexican elections consistently achieve much higher voter turnout than those in the United States, often exceeding 70% even in small towns, compared to a median of just 26% for U.S. city elections. Despite historical issues with corruption and violence, Mexico’s electoral system has managed to foster strong civic engagement and representative outcomes. This contrasts sharply with the U.S., where voter turnout is significantly lower, and many dismiss Mexico’s democratic achievements. Historically, Mexico has demonstrated greater inclusivity and diversity in its political leadership. For instance, it elected the first female president in North America (Claudia Sheinbaum) and the first Black president (Vicente Guerrero), as well as the only Indigenous president (Benito Juárez). These milestones highlight Mexico’s commitment to representative democracy, even during periods of authoritarianism when citizens actively resisted rigged systems. In comparison, the U.S. has struggled with systemic exclusion, particularly of women, people of color, and Indigenous communities, despite its founding principles of “We the People.” The article challenges perceptions that Mexican elections are inherently flawed or less democratic than those in the U.S. While acknowledging past corruption and violence, it emphasizes Mexico’s long-standing emphasis on local governance and civic participation. This contrasts with the U.S., where voter turnout is often criticized but systemic barriers to engagement persist. The piece argues that Mexico’s high voter turnout reflects a deep-rooted commitment to representative politics, even in the face of challenges. The implications for U.S. democracy are significant. If Mexico can achieve consistently higher voter turnout and more diverse political representation despite its struggles, it suggests that democratic systems elsewhere could learn from these lessons. The article calls for a reevaluation of assumptions about Mexican democracy and a closer examination of how other nations foster civic engagement and inclusive governance. Ultimately, the piece highlights the importance of comparing democratic systems to identify strengths and weaknesses. While the U.S. often views itself as a model of democracy, Mexico’s electoral successes offer valuable insights that could improve political participation and representation in other countries, including the U.S.

Verticals

newscalifornia

Originally published on Los Angeles Times on 2/11/2026