Don't believe the hyperscalers! AI can't cure the climate crisis
The Register
February 19, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
AI’s potential to solve the climate crisis is being overstated by its advocates, according to a new report funded by environmental groups. While tech leaders like Eric Schmidt and Bill Gates argue that AI could offset emissions from data centers, the study reveals that most claims about AI’s climate benefits are based on weak evidence and conflate traditional AI with more energy-intensive generative AI systems.
The report, authored by energy analyst Ketan Joshi, examined 154 claims of AI’s environmental benefits across eight sources, including tech companies like Microsoft and Google. It found that only four of these claims related to generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT or Gemini, which are far more energy-hungry than traditional AI models used for tasks like predictive analytics. The study also highlighted that the majority of these claims lack credible academic support, with many relying on corporate publications or media reports instead.
Joshi’s analysis suggests that companies promoting AI as a climate solution are misleading the public by blending the impacts of both types of AI. Traditional AI may offer some efficiency gains, but generative AI’s energy demands—often met by fossil fuel-powered data centers—are significant and rarely offset by its alleged benefits. This “greenwashing” misleads consumers and policymakers into believing that AI can single-handedly address climate change, while in reality, it often contributes to the problem.
The report underscores the importance of transparency and evidence when discussing AI’s role in tackling climate issues. For tech enthusiasts and policymakers, understanding the nuanced impacts of different AI types is crucial for developing meaningful strategies to combat the climate crisis without falling for overhyped claims.
Verticals
tech
Originally published on The Register on 2/19/2026