End, don’t mend, the prime-time State of the Union address
The Hill
by Chris StirewaltFebruary 24, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The article argues that instead of trying to "mend" the declining prime-time State of the Union address, we should consider ending it altogether. Historians often refer to the second half of the 20th century as "the Television Age," a period when television became the dominant force in American culture and politics. The annual State of the Union address, once a major event broadcast live on TV, has lost much of its impact over time. The article suggests that the symbolic significance of this tradition now outweighs its practical value, with modern audiences increasingly tuning out or focusing elsewhere.
The Television Age transformed how Americans consumed news and entertainment, making events like the State of the Union a spectacle designed for mass audiences. However, the rise of DVRs, streaming platforms, and social media has fundamentally changed how people engage with content. Today's fragmented media landscape means that fewer people are watching these broadcasts live, and those who do often multitask or seek alternative perspectives in real time. The article points out that the address has become more of a political ritual than a meaningful conversation starter.
Ending the prime-time State of the Union could allow politicians to focus on more effective forms of communication. Instead of relying on a format that no longer resonates with many Americans, leaders could experiment with new ways to connect directly with the public—such as town halls, live events, or digital platforms. This shift would align with the evolving nature of media consumption and allow for more authentic, immediate dialogue. Ultimately, the article suggests that prioritizing substance over tradition could strengthen political engagement in a modern era.
This issue matters deeply to readers interested in politics because it highlights the broader challenges of adapting traditional institutions to contemporary realities. The decline of prime-time TV viewership raises questions about how politicians can effectively reach voters in an age of fractured media consumption. By rethinking outdated practices like the State of the Union, policymakers could better connect with citizens and revitalize civic discourse. This debate is not just about one speech but about the future of democratic communication in a rapidly changing world.
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/24/2026