Evidence alone won’t save biodiversity: the golden apple snail reveals an implementation gap

Nature

by Fengbo Li

February 24, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

Evidence alone isn't enough to ensure biodiversity conservation; effective implementation of research findings is equally critical. The case of the golden apple snail, an invasive species causing significant ecological damage in regions like Southeast Asia, highlights this gap between knowledge and action. While scientists have identified strategies to manage these snails, such as biological control methods, challenges like funding constraints, lack of coordination, and local resistance often hinder their implementation. The article emphasizes that the golden apple snail's impact isn't just environmental—it also affects aquaculture, a key industry in many regions. Despite clear solutions existing, their widespread adoption remains elusive. This illustrates broader issues within conservation efforts, where evidence-based policies are not always translated into effective action due to systemic barriers. The authors stress the importance of bridging this implementation gap. They call for stronger collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and local communities to ensure that scientific evidence leads to real-world solutions. Addressing these challenges is crucial for safeguarding biodiversity and ensuring sustainable practices in industries like aquaculture. Ultimately, the article underscores the need for a shift from focusing solely on gathering evidence to prioritizing its practical application. By fostering partnerships and addressing implementation barriers, we can move closer to meaningful conservation outcomes that protect both ecosystems and livelihoods.

Verticals

scienceresearch

Originally published on Nature on 2/24/2026