Gallup’s Presidential Approval Misstep

National Review

by Karlyn Bowman

February 14, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

Gallup’s long-standing reputation as a trusted name in polling has been called into question after reports surfaced of its recent misstep in measuring presidential approval ratings. The polling giant’s historical approach to tracking public sentiment has seemingly taken a backseat to modern methods, raising concerns about the accuracy and reliability of their data. This shift away from established practices not only impacts how we view current political figures but also casts doubt on the broader integrity of the polling industry itself. The issue stems from Gallup’s decision to alter its methodology for calculating presidential approval ratings, which has led to inconsistencies in historical comparisons. For example, former President Truman’s post-retirement popularity, once celebrated as a testament to his legacy, now appears overshadowed by revised metrics that downplay his enduring public favor. This departure from traditional polling techniques raises eyebrows among experts and highlights a growing trend within the industry: a disregard for its own historical context. Critics argue that Gallup’s move undermines its credibility and sets a concerning precedent for other polling organizations. By deviating from time-tested methods, the company risks eroding public trust in political polling at large. This shift comes amid heightened scrutiny of pollsters’ role in shaping public perception, particularly during high-stakes elections. The implications of this misstep extend beyond Gallup’s reputation to broader concerns about how we measure and interpret political success. As the industry moves forward, questions remain about whether modernization should take precedence over historical accuracy or if a balance must be struck to preserve trust and reliability. For readers deeply invested in politics, understanding these dynamics is crucial for evaluating the credibility of polling data and its impact on public opinion. Ultimately, Gallup’s misstep serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of preserving industry traditions while adapting to evolving standards. For those tracking political trends, this episode underscores the need for transparency and consistency in polling practices to maintain public confidence. As the industry continues to navigate these challenges, the accuracy and

Verticals

politicsconservative

Originally published on National Review on 2/14/2026