Homan on ICE Minneapolis pullback: ‘If we need to come back, we’ll come back’
The Hill
by Sophie BramsFebruary 13, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
Tom Homan, referred to as the "border czar," clarified on Thursday that the decision to scale back President Trump’s deployment of immigration enforcement officers in Minnesota does not signal a complete withdrawal from the state. During an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham, Homan emphasized that hundreds of DHS special agents will remain in Minneapolis to continue investigating fraud allegations tied to immigration-related issues. This indicates that while the initial surge of personnel has been reduced, ICE’s presence and efforts in Minnesota are far from over.
The pullback of ICE agents was initially seen as a potential reduction in enforcement activity, but Homan assured that operations would persist with a focus on combating fraud within the immigration system. The ongoing investigations aim to address claims of irregularities in immigration cases, which have drawn significant attention from both political and legal circles. This move reflects the Trump administration’s continued commitment to border security and immigration enforcement, even as it adjusts its strategy in response to criticism and legal challenges.
This development is particularly relevant for those following U.S. politics and immigration policy, as it underscores the administration’s ongoing efforts to enforce immigration laws while addressing allegations of misconduct. Critics argue that such investigations could be politically motivated, while supporters view them as necessary measures to ensure the integrity of immigration processes. The situation highlights the tension between enforcement priorities and the need for transparency in government operations.
For readers interested in politics, understanding the implications of ICE’s actions is crucial. While the reduction in personnel may signal a shift in strategy, the ongoing investigations indicate that the agency remains active in Minnesota and across the country. This balance between enforcement and investigation will likely continue to shape debates on immigration policy and border security in the coming months.
In summary, Homan’s remarks clarify that ICE’s withdrawal from Minnesota does not mean abandoning the state entirely. The focus now shifts to maintaining a long-term presence through ongoing investigations, which aim to address fraud allegations and uphold the integrity of immigration processes. This approach reflects the administration’s broader strategy to balance enforcement with accountability, a dynamic that remains central to political discussions
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/13/2026