How The Times Handles the Congressional Hearing Circus

NYT Homepage

by Mike Abrams

February 18, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

The article discusses how *The Times* approaches coverage of high-drama Congressional hearings, often characterized by performative politicians and witnesses. Three editors in Washington share their strategies for balancing the spectacle with substance, focusing on maintaining accuracy, context, and fairness while addressing the entertainment aspect that often surrounds these events. The editors emphasize the importance of analyzing each politician’s performance to determine if it aligns with their past behavior or reflects genuine concern. They also highlight the need to assess broader implications, such as how political theater impacts public trust in institutions or policy outcomes. By fact-checking claims and providing context, *The Times* aims to avoid sensationalism while engaging readers who may otherwise dismiss these hearings as mere spectacle. The article underscores why this approach matters: In an era of hyper-partisanship and media noise, responsible journalism is crucial for cutting through the chaos and offering readers a reliable, insightful perspective. By prioritizing transparency in their coverage, *The Times* ensures that its audience can navigate the complexities of Congressional proceedings with clarity and understanding.

Verticals

newsgeneral

Originally published on NYT Homepage on 2/18/2026