How to get rid of a prime minister

The Economist
February 14, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The article explores historical precedents and political dynamics that could influence efforts to remove Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Drawing parallels to past Westminster scandals and leadership crises, it suggests that while rumors of a potential ousting are circulating, such scenarios often fail to materialize due to the complex nature of British politics. The piece humorously references "phantom ministers" or "men in grey suits," who are said to operate behind the scenes but rarely emerge to effect change. The article delves into the current political mood in Westminster, where dissatisfaction with Starmer's leadership has led to speculation about a possible coup. It highlights how historical attempts to oust prime ministers have often been overhyped, with actual outcomes shaped by factors like party unity, public support, and institutional constraints. The narrative underscores the challenges of political intrigue and the likelihood that such efforts would require significant coordination among key players. For readers interested in business and economics, the article offers insights into how political instability can impact economic policies and market dynamics. A potential change in leadership could lead to shifts in policy priorities, affecting sectors like finance, trade, and regulation. The piece serves as a reminder of the interconnectedness between politics and economics, emphasizing the need for businesses to stay attuned to evolving political landscapes. Ultimately, the article provides a nuanced perspective on the likelihood of Sir Keir Starmer's removal, while also offering lessons from history that could be valuable for anyone monitoring political developments in Westminster. Its focus on the interplay between power dynamics and economic outcomes makes it particularly relevant for those interested in business and economic implications of political change.
Verticals
businesseconomics
Originally published on The Economist on 2/14/2026