Hubris Or Poor Judgment? As Epstein Files Loomed, The Clock Was Ticking On Brad Karp’s Power At Paul, Weiss

Above the Law

by Staci Zaretsky

February 13, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

The legal world was shaken as Brad Karp, a long-time leader at Paul, Weiss, announced his departure following the release of Jeffrey Epstein's files. These documents revealed Karp's ties to Epstein, leading to questions about whether his decision to remain in power was due to poor judgment or hubris. The delay in the file's release had set a ticking clock on Karp's leadership, ultimately ending his reign despite his reputation for crisis management. Karp, known for his shrewdness and media navigation skills, faced unexpected scrutiny when Epstein's connections came to light. His failure to anticipate the fallout from these revelations surprised many, as he was seen as a seasoned leader who could navigate such challenges. The timing of the file release, especially after the Transparency Act passed, added pressure, making his continued leadership appear tone-deaf. This situation highlights critical issues in legal ethics and leadership. Karp's downfall underscores the importance of foresight and moral judgment in high-stakes roles. His story serves as a cautionary tale about reputation management and the consequences of maintaining power despite ethical concerns.

Verticals

legalnews

Originally published on Above the Law on 2/13/2026