ICE whistleblower accuses agency of ‘deficient, defective and broken’ training amid hiring surge
The Hill
by Rebecca BeitschFebruary 23, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) whistleblower has accused the agency of failing to provide adequate training to its officers, particularly in areas such as legal protocols for using deadly force, amid a surge in hiring new personnel. Ryan Schwank, a former ICE lawyer who blew the whistle on these practices, claims that the agency has consistently misled the public about the quality and comprehensiveness of its training programs. He alleges that training for new officers has been significantly reduced, raising concerns about their preparedness to handle critical situations.
Schwank highlights specific instances where legal training was minimized, including instruction on when ICE agents are permitted to use lethal force. This comes at a time when ICE has been rapidly expanding its workforce, which has led to questions about whether the agency is prioritizing quantity over quality in its hiring practices. The whistleblower’s allegations suggest that ICE may be operating with insufficient oversight and accountability, potentially putting both agents and the communities they serve at risk.
This issue holds significant political importance, as it touches on broader concerns about public safety, the integrity of law enforcement, and the transparency of federal agencies. If true, Schwank’s claims could have far-reaching implications for ICE’s operations and its relationship with the American public. Critics argue that such lapses in training not only endanger individuals but also erode trust in the agency’s ability to enforce laws effectively and responsibly. This controversy underscores the need for increased scrutiny of ICE’s practices and policies, particularly as they relate to officer training and accountability mechanisms.
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/23/2026