In Windsor, Some See Family Drama in the Andrew Accusations

NYT Homepage

by Megan Specia and Stephen Castle

February 25, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

In Windsor, residents are divided over Prince Andrew’s scandal, with some expressing strong reactions and others showing apathy. The fallout from Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s legal troubles has sparked debates among locals about the monarchy’s future and Queen Elizabeth II’s legacy. While some express sympathy for the queen, noting that her children have “let her down,” others are indifferent, focusing on their own lives. This sentiment reflects a broader shift in public opinion toward the monarchy, with many feeling disconnected or apathetic about royal scandals. Local residents like Sue Jones and Madelaine Beckley voice strong opinions, with Jones stating, “Andrew’s time is up,” drawing comparisons to historical punishments for misconduct. Beckley shares her friend’s view, expressing pity for the queen and frustration with her children’s actions. These reactions highlight a growing sense of disillusionment among some members of the public. On the other hand, Jenny Finnerty represents those who have grown tired of royal drama, stating, “I do not care at all about him.” This sentiment reflects a broader trend of apathy toward the monarchy, as many feel the royal family’s issues are distant from their own lives. The lack of concern among some locals underscores a shifting public attitude toward the institution. The situation in Windsor highlights how royal scandals can reveal deeper societal divides and reflect changing views on the monarchy’s relevance. As public interest wanes and apathy grows, it raises questions about the future of the British monarchy’s influence and image. This story matters to readers as it offers insight into how ordinary people are reacting to high-profile scandals involving royalty, and how these reactions could shape the institution’s legacy.

Verticals

newsgeneral

Originally published on NYT Homepage on 2/25/2026