Jack Hughes or Eileen Gu?

National Review

by Rich Lowry

February 24, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

The Winter Olympics showcased a stark contrast in perspectives on national loyalty through the experiences of two American-born athletes: Jack Hughes, the gold-medal-winning U.S. hockey player, and Eileen Gu, the freestyle skier competing for China. While Hughes openly expressed his love for America and patriotism, Gu embodied a more cosmopolitan viewpoint, refusing to engage in discussions about national loyalty. This divide highlights broader philosophical questions about whether loyalty is a chosen identity or an unchangeable commitment. Jack Hughes’ passionate displays of affection for the U.S., including celebrating with the American flag and heartfelt statements about his country, reflected traditional notions of patriotism tied to one’s birthplace. On the other hand, Eileen Gu, while born in America, chose to compete for China and distanced herself from discussions about her national identity. Her approach aligns with a growing trend of individuals navigating multiple cultural identities in an increasingly globalized world. This philosophical debate over loyalty is deeply intertwined with political and cultural divides in American society. Hughes’ patriotism resonates with those who value traditional notions of nationalism, while Gu’s cosmopolitan perspective appeals to those who prioritize individual choice and global interconnectedness over rigid national allegiance. The contrast between their stances reflects larger societal tensions around immigration, identity, and the role of individuals in shaping their own sense of belonging. Ultimately, this discussion matters because it touches on core values that shape political divides: whether one’s loyalty to a country is inherent or something that can be chosen based on personal beliefs

Verticals

politicsconservative

Originally published on National Review on 2/24/2026