Jillian Michaels on Trump, RFK Jr. defense of pesticide: ‘Devastating’
The Hill
by Ashleigh FieldsFebruary 24, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
Jillian Michaels, a prominent health and wellness expert, has strongly criticized President Trump’s recent executive order approving the use of glyphosate, a controversial pesticide. In her remarks, Michaels described the decision as “devastating,” emphasizing that the link between glyphosate and cancer is not merely a conspiracy theory but supported by hundreds of studies. She stressed that these studies consistently show a significant increase in cancer risk associated with glyphosate exposure.
Glyphosate, widely used in agriculture as an herbicide, has been at the center of ongoing debates over its safety. While some regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have deemed it non-carcinogenic, concerns about its potential health risks persist. Michaels’ comments highlight the growing body of research that suggests even low levels of glyphosate exposure could pose serious health hazards.
This issue is not just about science; it’s a political flashpoint in the broader debate over environmental regulations and public health. Critics argue that Trump’s decision to expand glyphosate use prioritizes corporate interests over potential human and ecological risks. The controversy underscores the tension between promoting agricultural productivity and safeguarding public health, a dilemma that resonates deeply with many voters.
For readers interested in politics and public health, this matter is particularly significant. It reflects the ongoing struggle to balance business needs with environmental and health concerns, a recurring theme in modern political discourse. Michaels’ stance adds to the growing chorus of voices advocating for stricter regulations on pesticides, challenging the notion that such chemicals are safe for widespread use.
In summary, Jillian Michaels’ criticism of Trump’s glyphosate decision highlights critical issues surrounding pesticide safety, environmental regulation, and public health. Her remarks serve as a reminder of the ongoing debates over how best to protect both agricultural interests and human well-being.
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/24/2026