Judge orders Greenpeace to pay $345m over Dakota Access pipeline protest
The Guardian World
by Associated Press in BismarckFebruary 25, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
A North Dakota judge has ruled that Greenpeace must pay $345 million in damages to Energy Transfer, a company behind the Dakota Access oil pipeline, following protests nearly a decade ago. The environmental group has argued that the amount is unsustainable and plans to contest the decision, with the legal battle far from over.
The case stems from protests against the Dakota Access pipeline in 2016, where Greenpeace was found liable for defamation and other claims brought by Energy Transfer. Judge James Gion reduced the initial jury award of $690 million to $345 million last year but has not finalized the exact amount yet. This legal action highlights the ongoing tensions between corporate interests and environmental activism.
The ruling raises broader implications for global environmental advocacy, as it challenges the ability of NGOs like Greenpeace to operate without facing significant financial repercussions. Legal battles over pipeline protests are increasingly common, with companies seeking compensation for disruptions caused by activists.
Greenpeace has vowed to fight the decision, potentially appealing the verdict. Meanwhile, Energy Transfer is exploring ways to collect the damages, underscoring the challenges both parties face in this high-stakes legal and ideological conflict. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future disputes between corporations and environmental groups, influencing how such conflicts are resolved globally.
This situation not only highlights the financial risks faced by activists but also underscores the broader debate over corporate accountability and environmental rights.
Verticals
worldpolitics
Originally published on The Guardian World on 2/25/2026