Judge rejects rapid Trump administration deportations to third countries
The Hill
by Sarah DavisFebruary 25, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
A federal judge in Boston has rejected the Trump administration's request to lift a court-imposed block on a controversial Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy that allows federal officials to deport migrants to countries other than their own. In his Wednesday ruling, U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy found that the third-country removal policy "is not fine," raising concerns about its legality and implications for due process. The decision underscores ongoing tensions between the administration's immigration enforcement priorities and judicial scrutiny of such policies.
The third-country removal program, first implemented under former DHS Secretary John Kelly, permits U.S. authorities to deport migrants bypassing their initial destination countries in favor of others where they have fewer legal protections or ties. Critics argue that this policy undermines international law and human rights standards, potentially exposing migrants to unsafe conditions, persecution, or separation from family members. Judge Murphy's ruling highlights these concerns, emphasizing that the administration failed to demonstrate how the policy aligns with legal and ethical frameworks.
The judge's decision is significant in the broader context of U.S. immigration policy under the Trump administration. It reflects a growing judicial pushback against行政 actions perceived as overstepping or disregarding established legal principles. While the administration has argued that third-country deportations are a necessary tool to maintain border security and deter migration, critics, including human rights groups and
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/25/2026