Khanna, Massie plan to force war powers vote on Iran
The Hill
by Emily BrooksFebruary 19, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) are set to push for a vote next week on a resolution that would require Congress to authorize any military action against Iran before President Trump can take such measures. This move comes amid reports from Trump administration officials suggesting a high likelihood of strikes on Iran, with one official stating there’s a 90% chance of such actions. Khanna emphasized the importance of congressional oversight, asserting that Trump cannot legally order military strikes without prior approval.
The resolution reflects growing concerns among lawmakers about the potential for U.S.-Iran tensions escalating into full-scale conflict. If passed, it would align with historical precedents where Congress has played a key role in decisions involving military force, such as during the Syrian crisis under the Obama administration. This effort highlights the ongoing debate over executive authority versus congressional oversight in matters of war and peace.
Khanna and Massie’s plan to bring the resolution to the floor underscores the political divide on Capitol Hill regarding Trump’s foreign policy. While some lawmakers support stronger measures against Iran, others, including these two representatives, argue for greater caution and a return to constitutional checks and balances. Their initiative also comes at a time when public sentiment appears increasingly critical of an escalation with Iran, which could have significant economic and geopolitical consequences.
This development is significant because it challenges the Trump administration’s approach to foreign policy and raises questions about the future of U.S.-Iran relations. By forcing a vote, Khanna and Massie aim to ensure that any military action has broad support from Congress, potentially preventing what they view as an unconstitutional overreach of executive power. Their efforts could set a precedent for future decisions involving military force, emphasizing the importance of legislative involvement in matters of war.
Ultimately, this resolution not only addresses the specific issue of strikes on Iran but also touches on broader constitutional principles. It highlights the delicate balance between presidential authority and congressional responsibility in times of conflict. For readers interested in politics, this story offers insight into how lawmakers are navigating complex international relations and domestic policy challenges.
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/19/2026