Les Wexner’s attorney whispers ‘I’ll f‑‑‑ing kill you’ for giving long answers during deposition
The Hill
by Fiona BorkFebruary 20, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
Billionaire retail mogul Les Wexner found himself at the center of a shocking legal incident during a deposition related to his ties with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Wexner’s attorney reportedly lost his temper after growing frustrated with Wexner for providing lengthy answers, allegedly saying, “I will f‑‑‑ing kill you if you answer another question with more than five words, OK.” The threatening remarks were captured on microphone during a deposition that lasted over four hours and is part of an ongoing investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney into Epstein’s alleged criminal activities.
Les Wexner, a prominent businessman known for founding L Brands and building a massive retail empire, has been under scrutiny for his past associations with Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, who died in 2019 while in federal custody, was a well-known sex offender and financier accused of exploiting young girls for decades. Wexner has faced questions about his involvement with Epstein, including allegations that he facilitated Epstein’s access to young women and may have profited from his criminal activities.
The incident highlights the high-stakes nature of legal proceedings involving such prominent figures. While it is not uncommon for tensions to rise during depositions, the explicit threat made by Wexner’s attorney raises concerns about the decorum of legal processes and the potential impact on witness credibility. Legal experts have noted that such behavior could undermine the fairness of the deposition process and draw unwanted attention to Wexner’s involvement in the case.
For readers interested in politics and high-profile legal affairs, this story underscores the intersection of power, money, and misconduct in elite circles. The case not only sheds light on Epstein’s alleged criminal activities but also raises questions about how those in positions of influence may be held accountable for their actions. As the investigation continues, Wexner’s credibility and reputation will likely come under increased scrutiny, further complicating his already controversial public image.
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/20/2026