Manufacturers group ups fight against RFK Jr. focus on ultra-processed foods
The Hill
by Max RegoFebruary 25, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), a powerful lobbying group representing 14,000 companies across various industries, including food and beverage, has taken a strong stance against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s recent initiative to investigate the safety of ultra-processed foods. In response, NAM released a report challenging the need for further scrutiny of these products, which are widely consumed in the U.S., and argued that they already meet existing safety standards. This move highlights the ongoing tension between public health concerns and industry interests.
Ultra-processed foods, often criticized for their high sugar, salt, and fat content, have come under increasing scrutiny from public health advocates. Critics argue that these products contribute to rising rates of chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. Kennedy's push to examine their safety aligns with growing calls for greater transparency and regulation in the food industry. However, NAM maintains that current regulations are sufficient and that the focus should instead be on promoting innovation and economic growth.
NAM's report emphasizes the role of ultra-processed foods in modern diets and argues that they can be part of a balanced diet when consumed responsibly. The association also highlights the economic importance of these products to the food and beverage industry, which employs millions of Americans and generates significant revenue for the U.S. economy. By framing the issue through an economic lens, NAM aims to counter public health advocates' arguments and protect its members from potential regulatory overreach.
This debate underscores the broader political landscape where industry influence often clashes with public health priorities. For readers interested in politics, understanding this conflict is crucial as it highlights the challenges of balancing corporate interests with public welfare. The outcome of this battle could have
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/25/2026