Oh, The Irony: Tech Accountability Case Sidelined By Lawyer’s Tech Violations

Above the Law

by Kathryn Rubino

February 23, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

A lawyer involved in a major tech accountability case has been removed from his leadership role after violating courthouse technology rules, creating a striking irony in the very case aimed at holding Big Tech accountable for its alleged harmful practices. Matthew Bergman, founder of the Social Media Victims Law Center, was ousted from the plaintiffs’ steering committee by Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl after he admitted to conducting a banned interview with the BBC inside the courthouse and allegedly taking a photo during court proceedings. The judge emphasized that such actions could hinder the case’s progress, stating they “threaten to impede your clients’ pursuit of their claims.” Bergman, who described his actions as “something for which I am deeply ashamed,” acknowledged the irony of his situation. He noted that failing to adhere to courtroom tech rules in a case about tech accountability was “humbling” and vowed to learn from the experience. While another attorney from his law center remains on the committee, Bergman faces further consequences with a contempt hearing scheduled for March 23. The incident highlights the high stakes of courtroom conduct, particularly in cases where technology plays a central role. Judge Kuhl’s strong response underscores the importance of adhering to courthouse rules, even when the case itself is about holding others accountable for their tech-related actions. Bergman’s removal serves as a reminder that lawyers must maintain professionalism and accountability, even in emotionally charged and high-profile litigation. This situation also raises questions about how legal teams manage technology in courtrooms, especially in cases involving tech giants like Meta. As the social media addiction litigation continues, the outcome of this disciplinary matter could set precedents for courtroom behavior and the handling of sensitive legal matters. Bergman’s downfall, while regrettable, serves as a cautionary tale for lawyers navigating the complexities of modern legal practice.

Verticals

legalnews

Originally published on Above the Law on 2/23/2026