Prosecutor Seeks Dismissal of Charges Against Man Shot by ICE

NYT Homepage

by Mitch Smith and Hamed Aleaziz

February 13, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

A federal prosecutor in Minnesota has sought the dismissal of charges against an immigrant who was shot by ICE agents after revealing that new evidence contradicts their earlier testimony. The judge granted this request, dropping all charges against the man and another individual involved in the incident. This decision came following a court filing by Daniel N. Rosen, the top federal prosecutor, who stated that the "newly discovered evidence" was inconsistent with the agents' claims. The case gained attention after two federal agents were suspended for their role in the shooting. Video evidence emerged showing that the sworn testimony of both officers contained untruthful statements. Acting Director Todd Lyons of Immigration and Customs Enforcement confirmed that the agents, whose identities remain undisclosed, have been placed on administrative leave pending an internal investigation. Lyons emphasized that they could face termination or even criminal charges if found guilty. The dismissal of charges was finalized with prejudice, meaning the men cannot be recharged in the future. This outcome highlights a growing concern over accountability within law enforcement, particularly in cases involving immigration enforcement. The incident has sparked debates about transparency and trust in federal agents, as well as the potential consequences for officers who provide false testimony. This case underscores the importance of oversight in law enforcement actions, especially when lives are at risk. For readers interested in news and developments related to immigration enforcement and accountability, this story provides a critical example of how discrepancies in official narratives can lead to significant legal outcomes.

Verticals

newsgeneral

Originally published on NYT Homepage on 2/13/2026