RSPS and XLP Offer Distinct Approaches to the Consumer Staples Sector. Which Is the Better Buy?
The Motley Fool
by newsfeedback@fool.com (Katie Brockman)February 14, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The article compares two ETFs targeting the U.S. consumer staples sector: the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). While both focus on similar sectors, they employ different portfolio construction methods, impacting diversification, returns, risk, and trading characteristics. Understanding these differences can help investors choose which ETF aligns better with their financial goals.
XLP uses a cap-weighted approach, meaning larger companies have a bigger influence on the fund's performance. This strategy often results in lower volatility and more predictable returns, as it relies on established market leaders. Over time, XLP has shown strong performance and is seen as a safer option for risk-averse investors. However, this concentration can limit diversification benefits.
In contrast, RSPS采用等权重方法，这意味着每家公司在组合中所占的比重相等。这种做法通常能提高小公司的影响力，增强潜在回报的同时也增加了风险。RSPS在过去表现优异，尤其是通过在波动性较大的市场环境中捕捉较小公司带来的增长机会。
投资者选择这两只ETF时需权衡稳定与增长、成本和风险因素。XLP适合寻求稳定回报的投资者，而RSPS则适合愿意承担更多波动以追求更高收益的人。了解这些差异对于做出明智投资决策至关重要。
Verticals
financeinvesting
Originally published on The Motley Fool on 2/14/2026