Senate Republican opposes Trump diplomatic nominee over anti-Israel comments

The Hill

by Laura Kelly

February 13, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

Senate Republican opposes Trump diplomatic nominee over anti-Israel comments

President Trump’s nomination of Jeremy Carl to oversee U.S. involvement in international organizations is facing significant opposition from a key Republican senator, Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah), due to Carl’s past comments on Israel and Jews. Curtis has indicated his intention to block Carl’s nomination from advancing out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, citing concerns over Carl’s过往 remarks as disqualifying. This development highlights a growing divide within the Republican party, particularly over issues involving Israel and Jewish communities. Carl’s nomination was already under scrutiny due to his controversial statements, which include comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany, among other inflammatory remarks. These comments were brought to light during Carl’s confirmation hearings, prompting criticism from both Democrats and some Republicans. Sen. Curtis, a vocal advocate for Israel, has long been a strong supporter of the U.S.-Israel relationship, making him particularly sensitive to language that could be perceived as anti-Semitic or hostile toward Israel. The opposition to Carl’s nomination underscores the high stakes involved in selecting individuals to represent the U.S. on the international stage. Critics argue that such positions require not only expertise but also a demonstrated commitment to diplomacy and sensitivity to global relations. The controversy over Carl’s remarks has sparked broader discussions about the importance of ethical considerations in diplomatic appointments. This situation also reflects the ongoing tensions within the Republican party over how to approach Israel and Jewish issues. Sen. Curtis’s stance aligns with a growing faction of Republicans who prioritize strong ties with Israel, viewing any criticism of the country as unacceptable. This ideological divide could have significant implications for U.S. foreign policy,

Verticals

politicsnews

Originally published on The Hill on 2/13/2026