State of Origin player rankings: Was Nick Daicos snubbed for best-afield honours?
Sydney Morning Herald
by Jon PierikFebruary 14, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
In a recent State of Origin clash, Victoria’s standout performers dominated the game, but one player’s omission from best-afield honors sparked debate. Nick Daicos delivered an exceptional performance, amassing 38 disposals, 13 score involvements, and an impressive 670 metres gained. Despite his stellar efforts, he was overlooked for the prestigious EJ Whitten Medal, which went to Lachie Ash. The decision has raised questions among fans and analysts about whether Daicos, often described as the game’s most damaging player, was snubbed due to a lack of recognition or other factors.
The match showcased several high-caliber players. Marcus Bontempelli, Victoria’s captain, had 30 disposals and played a pivotal role in his team’s control early in the game. Meanwhile, Max Gawn provided solid ruck work, while Lachie Ash’s 25 touches and rebounding ability earned him the medal. However, Daicos’ performance was equally commendable, with his precision passes, strong contributions in key moments, and leadership on the field leaving many wondering if he should have been considered for the honor.
The controversy highlights broader debates about how player recognition is determined in high-stakes games like State of Origin. While Ash’s dominance and defensive pressure were undeniably impactful, Daicos’ ability to influence the game through his playmaking and physical presence was equally significant. The omission has sparked discussions about whether midfielders with such a profound impact on both attack and defense are getting the recognition they deserve.
For readers interested in the world of sports, this story underscores how
Verticals
worldaustralia
Originally published on Sydney Morning Herald on 2/14/2026