The Palestinian cause cannot speak only to the left
Al Jazeera
February 15, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The Palestinian cause has long resonated most strongly with the political left, relying on moral arguments rooted in human rights, anticolonialism, and international law. While these principles remain valid and urgent, they have not been enough to shift Western policy, which is increasingly shaped by security-driven calculations and conservative power structures. The article argues that for Palestinian advocates to achieve meaningful change, they must engage with arenas where decisions on military aid, diplomatic positioning, and protest laws are made—spaces dominated by strategic, legal, and institutional thinking rather than moral or historical frameworks.
The recent escalation of Israel's conflict in Gaza has brought global attention to the Palestinian cause, but this visibility has not translated into political influence. Despite increased public awareness and international scrutiny, Western governments continue to provide military support to Israel while restricting pro-Palestinian activities. For instance, Germany has banned demonstrations, U.S. states have penalized institutions linked to boycott campaigns, and the UK has framed protests through the lens of extremism and public order. These measures highlight how domestic security concerns often override international legal principles.
The challenge lies in how Palestinian advocacy is framed. While the cause is grounded in universal values like self-determination and freedom from occupation, it is frequently communicated through
Verticals
worldpolitics
Originally published on Al Jazeera on 2/15/2026