The Supreme Court Shows Its Work

National Review

by Christian Schneider

February 26, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court, often viewed as the least democratic branch of government, has paradoxically emerged as one of the most transparent institutions in the federal system. Unlike other branches, such as the executive, which frequently deflects questions and avoids accountability, the Supreme Court provides public access to its decisions, processes, and interactions. This transparency is evident through published opinions, orders, and even transcripts of oral arguments, offering insight into how justice is served. The article contrasts this with the opacity of the executive branch, exemplified by Dave Chappelle’s “Black Bush” sketch, where the president dismisses questions about decision-making processes. In 2026, such practices highlight a concerning lack of accountability in the White House, leaving the public in the dark about how decisions are made. This absence of transparency undermines trust in democratic institutions and raises questions about the integrity of governance. The Supreme Court’s openness stands as a model for other branches to follow. Its willingness to disclose its work fosters accountability and ensures that its rulings are subject to scrutiny. This transparency is particularly vital because the Court’s decisions have far-reaching consequences, shaping laws and policies across the nation. By making its processes accessible, it upholds the principle of an open judiciary, reinforcing public confidence in the rule of law. The implications of this transparency extend beyond the courtroom, setting a standard for government accountability. As other branches grapple with opacity, the Court’s example underscores the importance of clear and accessible decision-making. For readers interested in politics, understanding the role of transparency in judicial processes is crucial to evaluating the health of democracy and the balance of power within the federal government. Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s commitment to transparency serves as a reminder that even the least democratic branch can play a vital role in fostering trust and accountability. Its practices not only illuminate its own operations but also challenge other branches to prioritize openness in their governance. This dynamic highlights the ongoing tension between democracy and opacity, emphasizing why transparency remains a cornerstone of a functioning political system.

Verticals

politicsconservative

Originally published on National Review on 2/26/2026