The Supreme Court’s Complicated Takedown of Trump’s Tariffs

The New Yorker

by Amy Davidson Sorkin

February 23, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

The Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump’s use of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) in a landmark decision. The justices, including those appointed by Trump, found that the law does not explicitly authorize the imposition of tariffs. This decision highlights the limits on presidential authority and underscores the importance of statutory interpretation in legal matters. The case, *Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump* and *Trump v. V.O.S. Selections*, was brought by small businesses and states challenging Trump’s tariff policies. The Court’s majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, emphasized that while IEEPA grants broad powers during national emergencies, it does not specifically allow for tariffs. This ruling effectively curtailed Trump’s ability to impose tariffs unilaterally, a practice he had pursued with enthusiasm since taking office. Reacting to the decision, Trump expressed frustration, calling the justices who joined the majority “fools” and “lapdogs.” He even hinted at potentially escalating trade measures under different legal authority. This response underscores the ongoing tension between executive power and judicial oversight in matters of national policy. The ruling also raises questions about the validity of other trade deals negotiated by Trump using similar tactics. By relying on vague statutory language, the administration skirted established processes for imposing tariffs, which often require more rigorous investigations and time-limits. The Court’s decision sets a precedent for future administrations, emphasizing the need to adhere to legal frameworks when wielding executive authority. For readers interested in cultural and political dynamics, this case reflects broader debates about presidential overreach and accountability. It also highlights the intersection of law, economics, and international relations, offering insights into how power is balanced in democratic systems.

Verticals

culturenews

Originally published on The New Yorker on 2/23/2026