Trump Administration Announces That We Don’t Know Where the Sun Goes at Night
The Atlantic
February 14, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The Trump administration has taken an unprecedented step by declaring that the scientific consensus on climate change is no longer valid, effectively erasing federal authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. This decision follows a series of actions that have systematically rolled back environmental protections and dismissed scientific evidence. The announcement comes as part of a broader effort to redefine how the government approaches environmental policy, with implications for public health, global warming, and international climate agreements.
The move has been widely criticized by scientists and environmental groups, who argue that it undermines decades of research and threatens planetary stability. By erasing the legal basis for addressing carbon dioxide emissions, the administration is signaling a departure from established scientific norms and international efforts to combat climate change. This shift not only disregards the overwhelming consensus on the dangers of carbon pollution but also opens the door to further deregulation of industries that contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.
The decision has significant political implications, as it sets a precedent for ignoring scientific evidence in policy-making. It also raises concerns about the administration's ability to address urgent environmental challenges and its commitment to international climate agreements like the Paris Accord. By sidelining scientists and dismissing established facts, the government risks losing credibility on issues that directly impact public health and the environment.
This approach reflects a broader pattern of prioritizing short-term economic interests over long-term environmental and social costs. Critics warn that such policies will exacerbate the impacts of climate change, leading to more severe weather events, rising sea levels, and increased public health risks. The administration's stance on climate science has drawn sharp rebukes from experts and policymakers worldwide, highlighting a growing divide between political ideology and scientific reality.
Ultimately, this decision represents a significant regression in environmental policy and underscores the importance of maintaining scientific integrity in governance. As the world faces escalating climate challenges, the ability of governments to act based on evidence is crucial for ensuring a sustainable future. The Trump administration's actions not only ignore this reality but also set a concerning precedent for future policymakers.
Verticals
politicsculture
Originally published on The Atlantic on 2/14/2026