Trump predicts Supreme Court will rule against him on birthright citizenship after tariffs loss

The Hill

by Tara Suter

February 23, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

Trump predicts Supreme Court will rule against him on birthright citizenship after tariffs loss

President Trump has predicted that the Supreme Court will rule against him on the issue of birthright citizenship following its recent rejection of his sweeping tariffs. In remarks made on Monday morning, Trump suggested that the court's decision could ultimately favor China and other nations, signaling a potential shift in the legal landscape surrounding immigration policies. This prediction comes as the administration faces mounting challenges to its强硬 stance on undocumented immigrants, particularly regarding the rights of children born in the United States to non-citizen parents. The political significance of this issue cannot be overstated. Trump has long sought to reinterpret the 14th Amendment's "birthright citizenship" clause, which currently guarantees citizenship to all individuals born in the U.S., regardless of their parents' status. His efforts have faced strong opposition from legal experts and Democrats, who argue that altering this constitutional right would undermine decades of established law and precedent. The Supreme Court's decision on birthright citizenship is expected to set a major legal and political precedent, potentially influencing future immigration policies and debates. The outcome of this case could also impact Trump's broader agenda on immigration enforcement. If the court rules against him, it may limit his ability to restrict undocumented immigration through executive actions. This would likely be seen as a significant setback for the administration, which has made immigration enforcement a central pillar of its policy platform. Conversely, if the court sides with Trump, it could pave the way for more restrictive policies, further polarizing the already contentious issue. For readers interested in politics, this case highlights the ongoing tension between executive authority and

Verticals

politicsnews

Originally published on The Hill on 2/23/2026