Trump reportedly frustrated as he waits on envoys’ judgment over Iran strikes – US politics live

The Guardian World

by Tom Ambrose

February 24, 2026

AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary

Donald Trump’s decision to order airstrikes against Iran is reportedly on hold as he awaits the judgment of his special envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. This cautious approach comes amid growing tensions between the United States and Iran, with Trump weighing a significant military action that could have far-reaching consequences. Meanwhile, Trump is preparing for his second major State of the Union address to Congress, set to take place in Washington on Tuesday. This speech will not only mark a key moment in his presidency but also the first time he will stand before the Supreme Court justices since they ruled his tariffs illegal. The State of the Union address holds particular significance as it is the last major speech Trump will deliver before the 2026 midterms, giving him an opportunity to shape the narrative ahead of what could be a pivotal election cycle. The timing of this speech also coincides with heightened geopolitical tensions, particularly with Iran, which has been a focal point of Trump’s foreign policy. While Trump has previously shown a willingness to take bold actions, including airstrikes and diplomatic withdrawals, his reliance on the advice of envoys like Witkoff and Kushner suggests a more deliberate approach this time around. This situation underscores the delicate balance of power and responsibility that comes with the presidency, particularly in matters of national security and international relations. Trump’s decision-making process, which involves seeking input from trusted advisors, highlights the complexities of navigating such high-stakes scenarios. As the world watches, the outcome of this deliberation will not only impact US-Iran relations but also set a precedent for how future administrations handle similar challenges. The broader implications of Trump’s potential airstrikes extend beyond immediate military actions, as they could influence the trajectory of Middle Eastern stability and US diplomatic efforts in the region. This moment also raises questions about Trump’s approach to foreign policy compared to his predecessors, particularly his reliance on envoys and advisors rather than relying solely on traditional channels like the Department of State or Pentagon. Ultimately, whether Trump proceeds with airstrikes or opts for a different course of action will be closely scrutinized by both domestic and international audiences. This decision not only reflects Trump’s

Verticals

worldpolitics

Originally published on The Guardian World on 2/24/2026