Trump’s new interest in war will end badly
Financial Times
February 23, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
U.S. President Donald Trump's recent shift toward embracing "wars of choice"—conflicts that are politically motivated rather than defensively necessary—marks a significant departure from his earlier rhetoric. Once a critic of such military actions, Trump has now shown a growing appetite for engaging in optional conflicts, particularly in regions like Syria and Iran. This strategic pivot could lead to severe consequences, both diplomatically and economically, as it raises tensions with key global powers such as Russia and China.
Historically, "wars of choice" have been associated with significant risks and potential long-term instability. By taking on these conflicts, Trump is venturing into territory that has traditionally required careful political calculation. His recent decisions to escalate military presence in the Middle East, despite earlier vows to avoid entanglement in regional disputes, signal a more assertive foreign policy stance.
This shift poses notable challenges for international relations and global business. Increased geopolitical tensions often lead to market instability, as investors grow cautious about potential disruptions in trade routes and supply chains. Moreover, heightened military activity can strain diplomatic efforts, potentially leading to broader economic fallout. Businesses operating in affected regions may face increased operational risks, while global markets could experience volatility due to shifting alliances and rising hostilities.
From an economic perspective, Trump's new approach to foreign policy could have far-reaching implications for business and
Verticals
businessfinance
Originally published on Financial Times on 2/23/2026