“Trying to lie”: Graham Allen dares Candace Owens to respond after Tracy Martin disputes Erika Kirk allegations
Times of India
by SUMIT ROYFebruary 22, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
Graham Allen, a popular YouTuber, recently took aim at political commentator Candace Owens during an interview with Tracy Martin, a close friend of Erika Kirk, over what he described as false claims made by Owens about Erika Kirk's whereabouts on the day Charlie Kirk was shot. In a heated and emotional episode of his show, Allen challenged Owens to defend her allegations publicly, calling them "lies" and daring her to provide evidence to support her claims. Tracy Martin, who has known Erika Kirk for 15 years, refuted Owens' assertions, including the claim that her daughter worked as Erika's assistant and was connected to TPUSA. Martin revealed that her daughter actually worked for Erika's clothing brand, Proclaim Bible365, not TPUSA, and therefore had no reason to be at UVU where Charlie Kirk was shot. She also denied Owens' claim that Tracy had sensed something was wrong on the day of the shooting and prevented her daughter from going there.
The interview delved into specific details of Owens' reporting, with Martin clarifying that Erika Kirk was with her sick mother on September 10, directly contradicting Owens' statement. Additionally, Martin rejected claims that there was an argument between Charlie and Erika Kirk the day before the shooting. Allen emphasized his commitment to "debunk these lies" and urged viewers to hold him accountable if he was wrong. The episode highlights the ongoing tension between Allen and Owens over what Allen perceives as Owens' misleading reporting.
This controversy matters because it underscores the importance of accuracy in media reporting, particularly when dealing with sensitive and high-profile cases. As public figures continue to share their versions of events, the need for transparency and accountability becomes increasingly critical. By directly challenging Owens' claims and providing what he describes as evidence, Allen is aiming to set the record straight. The episode serves as a reminder of how quickly false information can spread and the potential consequences it can have on individuals involved in such incidents.
Ultimately, the clash between Allen and Owens reflects broader debates about truth, media responsibility, and public trust in journalism. As the situation evolves, readers interested in world news will likely follow developments closely, eager to see how this unfolds and what it means for the future of online reporting and public discourse.
Verticals
worldasia
Originally published on Times of India on 2/22/2026