Vance: Supreme Court tariff decision represents ‘lawlessness from the court’
The Hill
by Sarah DavisFebruary 20, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
Vice President Vance strongly criticized the Supreme Court’s recent decision to strike down a significant portion of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs on Friday. In a statement shared on social platform X, Vance argued that the court’s ruling ignored Congress’s intent to grant the president the authority to regulate imports. He accused the justices of exceeding their judicial role and engaging in “lawlessness,” asserting that the decision undermines the separation of powers and sets a dangerous precedent for future cases.
The tariffs in question were part of Trump’s broader trade policies aimed at addressing unfair trade practices, particularly with China. The Supreme Court’s ruling, however, found that many of these tariffs exceeded presidential authority as outlined by Congress in past legislation. Legal experts note that this decision could have far-reaching implications for U.S. trade policy and the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches.
Vance’s criticism reflects a broader debate over the limits of presidential authority and the role of an independent judiciary. While some argue that the court’s decision was necessary to uphold
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/20/2026