Washington doesn’t need another rich man’s golf course
The Hill
by Bill Press, opinion contributorFebruary 24, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
Donald Trump's plan to replace the East Potomac Golf Course with a private, members-only Trump-branded championship course has sparked outrage among Washingtonians. Critics argue that this decision disregards the needs of local residents and reinforces elitism in the nation's capital. The proposed golf course would cater exclusively to wealthy individuals, priced out-of-reach for most D.C. families, further alienating a community already wary of Trump's influence over public spaces.
The East Potomac Golf Course has long been a beloved public facility, offering affordable access to one of Washington's few remaining green spaces. It has historically served as a recreational hub for families, particularly children from underserved communities, providing a rare opportunity for kids to learn and play golf. Replacing this with a private club would exclude the majority of residents, turning a shared resource into an exclusive playground for the privileged.
This move is seen by many as emblematic of Trump's broader approach to public spaces during his presidency. From renovating the White House at taxpayer expense to installing gold-plated door handles in government buildings, critics argue that Trump has consistently prioritized his personal preferences over the needs of the city and its people. His decision to replace the golf course aligns with a pattern of catering to wealthy elites rather than fostering inclusivity.
For those interested in politics, this issue highlights deeper concerns about access to public resources and the growing divide between the ultra-wealthy and average Americans. The controversy over the golf course serves as a microcosm of larger debates about economic inequality and the role of government in ensuring fair access to shared spaces. It raises questions about whether public infrastructure should be preserved for all citizens or privatized for profit, ultimately reflecting broader tensions around wealth, power, and representation in Washington D.C.
In a city where every decision carries symbolic weight, Trump's proposed golf course represents more than just a recreational facility—it symbolizes the erosion of democratic values and the concentration of privilege. As public spaces are increasingly commodified, many fear this trend will only deepen divisions and undermine the shared sense of community that defines Washington. The debate over the East Potomac Golf Course is not just about golf; it's about who gets
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on The Hill on 2/24/2026