What DC Doesn't Get About Armenian Genocide | RealClearPolitics
RealClearPolitics
by Stephan Pechdimaldji, National InterestFebruary 22, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
U.S. recognition of the Armenian Genocide must not be influenced by political expediency but rather grounded in historical truth and moral responsibility, argues Stephan Pechdimaldji in *The National Interest*. The article highlights how decades of Turkish denial and shifting U.S.-Turkish relations have clouded the issue, often prioritizing strategic interests over justice for Armenian survivors. Pechdimaldji emphasizes that acknowledging this tragic chapter is not just about historical accountability but also about upholding human rights and preventing future atrocities.
The piece underscores the long-standing debate over U.S. recognition of the Armenian Genocide, which began in 1915 and resulted in the deaths of up to 1.5 million Armenians. While some argue that political alliances with Turkey have delayed formal U.S. acknowledgment, others stress the importance of truth and justice. Pechdimaldji critiques the notion that recognition should be tied to political convenience, arguing that it undermines the dignity of victims and sets a dangerous precedent for ignoring human rights violations.
Ultimately, the article stresses why this matters to readers interested in politics: U.S. leadership on global human rights issues hangs in the balance. By avoiding politically motivated decisions, the United States can set a standard for justice and moral clarity in international relations. Recognition would not only right a historical wrong but also reaffirm democratic values and the importance of holding nations accountable for their past actions.
Verticals
politicsnews
Originally published on RealClearPolitics on 2/22/2026