What's best for LPGA Tour: dominance or parity? Annika Sörenstam, Lexi Thompson weigh in
CBS Sports
by
Patrick McDonald
February 26, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The LPGA Tour is at a pivotal moment as it debates whether dominance or parity would better serve the sport. In 2024, Nelly Korda dominated the season, winning five tournaments in a row and securing two major championships. Her performance created a wave of excitement, with Annika Sörenstam expressing her preference for dominant players who push the game forward and capture fans' attention. However, 2025 saw a shift toward parity, with 29 different winners across 32 events, highlighting the Tour's depth and variety.
Lexi Thompson acknowledged the appeal of seeing rising stars and established players compete, emphasizing how diverse winner lists can inspire new talent and keep the sport fresh. While some fans may miss the star power of a dominant player like Korda, others appreciate the unpredictability and inclusivity that comes with multiple winners. This dynamic reflects the broader debate within golf about whether the sport thrives more when one player stands out or when the field remains open.
The LPGA Tour's momentum heading into 2026—thanks to new broadcast deals and a growing list of top-tier commitments—adds urgency to this discussion. Players like Mel Reid argue that while parity is exciting, the game also needs rivalries or dominant figures to generate sustained interest. The debate over dominance versus parity isn't just about wins and losses; it's about shaping
Verticals
sports
Originally published on CBS Sports on 2/26/2026