What’s in a name? The debate over renaming cities and landmarks
Times of India
by PRIYANSHI RASTOGIFebruary 22, 2026
AI-Generated Deep Dive Summary
The debate over renaming cities and landmarks in India reflects a complex interplay between cultural identity, historical memory, and administrative efficiency. The article highlights how names carry deep emotional and historical significance, often resisting official changes even as governments push for updates. For instance, the Delhi Metro’s “Supreme Court” stop remains familiar to commuters despite the official Hindi name being "Sarvochh Nyayalaya," underscoring how deeply ingrained old names can be in public memory.
In recent years, India has seen a wave of renaming initiatives, particularly in urban areas. The government has rechristened landmarks like Race Course Road to Lok Kalyan Marg and Mayur Vihar Pocket 1 to Shree Ram Mandir Mayur Vihar. These changes align with efforts since 2014 to move away from colonial-era nomenclature, aiming to promote a more culturally resonant identity. The renaming of key government complexes in New Delhi, such as Seva Teerth and Kartavya Bhavan, is part of this broader shift, intended to modernize administrative infrastructure while reflecting India’s heritage.
However, the process is not without challenges. Renaming often leads to confusion for residents and visitors alike, especially when old names remain deeply ingrained in daily life. For example, renaming a metro station can disrupt familiar routines, as seen with Mayur Vihar’s transformation. While some view these changes as essential for cultural preservation, others argue that the practical benefits are limited without widespread public acceptance.
Verticals
worldasia
Originally published on Times of India on 2/22/2026